Private foundation
MILWAUKEE, WICity and state as stated on its FY2018 returnEIN
The funder's latest Form 990-PF says it gives only to organizations it has already chosen and does not accept unsolicited requests. An introduction is usually the only route.
Application policy: Funds preselected organizations only, as stated on the FY2018 return.
These lines count this foundation's own Form 990-PF returns that the IRS has published as data. An amended return replaces its original. They describe past returns only.
Application guidance comes from the funder's own Form 990-PF, Part XV (the section where a private foundation says how to apply), shown as filed. It is the funder's words, not ours. These fields are free text and the IRS form cuts them short. Filers sometimes put whole sentences in the contact-name box. Shown exactly as filed.
Giving by year
Total assets by year
| Year | Form | Revenue | Expenses | Giving | Assets | Net assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2018 | 990-PF | $7,975 | $1,074,920 | $1,070,815 | $0 |
Figures are as reported on the e-filed return, with no restatement. Fiscal years are the funder's own tax year, labelled by the calendar year the period ends in. A blank line means the return does not carry that figure; a real zero shows as $0. When an amended return replaces an original, every figure here uses the amended return. The original is not shown. Giving is what the funder actually paid out toward its charitable purpose in the year (qualifying distributions on Form 990-PF, charitable disbursements otherwise). Assets are what it holds; giving is what moves.
Recipient focus areas
Where recipients are
Based on the 10% of grant rows we could match to an organization record. The rest stay as reported. The IRS assigns the NTEE category when it grants exemption. It often reflects the original filing, not today's giving.
| Recipient | Purpose | Amount | Year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASHINGTON CNTY HISTORICAL SOCWEST BEND, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $2,000 | 2016 | |
Recipients are shown as the funder wrote them on the return. A recipient with a link was matched to an organization record; the rest stay as reported and are never guessed. Some links come from other funders' returns: when three or more of them wrote the same name and state with one EIN, and the city on this row matches, we use that EIN. The name on this row is still shown as this funder wrote it.
| $0 |
| FY2017 | 990-PF | $82,345 | $70,222 | $62,700 | $1,066,945 | $1,066,945 |
| FY2016 | 990-PF | $44,886 | $69,096 | $61,100 | $1,056,629 | $1,056,629 |
| CONTRIBUTION |
| $2,000 |
| 2016 |
| FAMILY CENTER OF WA CNTYWEST BEND, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $1,500 | 2017 |
| BIG BROTHERSSISTERS OF WA CNTYWEST BEND, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $1,500 | 2016 |
| BIG BROTHERSSISTERS OF WA CNTYWEST BEND, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $1,500 | 2017 |
| FAMILY CENTER OF WA CNTYWEST BEND, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $1,500 | 2016 |
| MILWAUKEE PUBLIC TELEVISIONMILWAUKEE, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $1,000 | 2017 |
| MILWAUKEE PUBLIC TELEVISIONMILWAUKEE, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $1,000 | 2016 |
| KETTLE MORAINE YMCAMatched to this organization because 6 grant-making charities wrote this name with its EIN. Source: Schedule I of their Form 990 returns, fiscal years 2020 to 2025. Counted Oct 9, 2026.WEST BEND, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $1,000 | 2017 |
| CEDAR COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONWEST BEND, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $1,000 | 2017 |
| KETTLE MORAINE YMCAMatched to this organization because 6 grant-making charities wrote this name with its EIN. Source: Schedule I of their Form 990 returns, fiscal years 2020 to 2025. Counted Oct 9, 2026.WEST BEND, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $1,000 | 2016 |
| CEDAR COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONWEST BEND, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $1,000 | 2016 |
| CITIZENS ADVOCACY OF WA CNTYWEST BEND, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $1,000 | 2017 |
| CITIZENS ADVOCACY OF WA CNTYWEST BEND, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $1,000 | 2016 |
| St Josephs Community FdnWest Bend, WI | Contribution | $500 | 2017 |
| ROOTS & BRANCHESWEST BEND, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $400 | 2017 |
| ROOTS & BRANCHESWEST BEND, WI | CONTRIBUTION | $400 | 2016 |
Nearest by size, location and giving pattern in the database. Geography weighs heavily. Treat it as a starting list, not a ranking of fit.